I thought that liberals were for open discussion?

I think the video speaks for itself;

 

BTW, also not on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, etc.

 

Liberals are never open to discussion unless it suits their twisted agenda. Otherwise, it's like talking to a brick wall.

View attachment 1260

 

You do realize that the reason this only appeared on FOX is because this guy holds extreme right wing prejudices that prevent him from being impartial? The guy has appeared on Hannity more than once, is a self proclaimed member of the tea party, and produced a book titled "Obama Zombies," Gee, I wonder where he stands on the issues. All you prove by claiming this wasn't on any other major network excepting FOX is that FOX is pushing an extreme right wing agenda. Also, comparing a public figure with a regular person is ludicrous, public figures are easily 10x more likely to be the target of assassination attempts by whacko tea party idiots with a third grade education all riled up on Hanity and this clown.

 

Oh, like when I educated you on the Declaration, Constitution, and BOR in the other thread, and you just walked away, that kind of "talking to a brick wall?"

You're so pathetic it hurts to even write a comment back to you.

 

post

 

post

 

And more posts! Still does not change the events.

 

Yeah, you keep calling them that, those of us not in the new FOX news inspired 99th percentile will continue call them non-issues. I have an idea, a fun experiment: try not watching, reading, or listening to FOX for 2 weeks, see if your head explodes.

 

Couldn't he just take the shortcut and stick an M-80 in his ear?

 

View attachment 1262

One can dream LOL

 

I'm curious why Bloomberg wouldn't even discuss the topic? Hypocrisy perhaps??? Oh, yeah!

 

You're a good one to talk about hypocrisy, Mr. epitome.

 

The funny part about this ambush journalism is that it gets proven over and over that any nut with a gun can take a shot at any public figure they decide to target because of our lax gun laws and then protecting yourself is somehow supposed to be proof that we need more guns. If there ever was more bassackwards logic, I haven't seen it.

 

I think what else you've failed to see (take those liberal blinders off, dammit!) is that if someone in power advocates taking away guns he should not be a hypocrite by keeping guns to defend himself. Pretty simple, eh? There are "nuts" out there who don't target only political figures but John and Jane Does, too. Shouldn't they have the same rights as Bloomberg? If they don't, it's hypocrisy in its most raw form.

 

Logical inconsistency. See if you can find it yourself. If you really need help feel free to ask, "there is no such thing as a stupid question," just stupid conservatives.