The title should have been Arguing with Ignorant People because I don't consider anyone who can go to the bathroom and wipe themselves to be an idiot. Just in case we have two or three of them here, I'd like to explain what they do and why they should be ignored after a few attempts to discuss differing opinions. You cannot change most uninformed people because they "know" the truth. Therefore arguing about anything goes like this: I write, "Biden was acused of inappropriate sex acts with a Congressional staffer." An ignorant person responds like this: "Prove it." or "Well, Trump has done inappropriate things to women too." In the first case, which is common knowledge to any informed person, you give out the name of his accuser! That is enough info for even a lazy, closed-minded person to learn what happened. In the second case, the weasel little Troll tries to change the subject or worse yet, does not engage further. That is a worthless poster and after several attemps to engage them, Block them. They have proved themselves to be worthless. A discussion with an informed poster may go like this. Someone starts a thread: "TRUMP IS A WOMANIZER!" Here is one possible reply of an informed, useful member of this forum that may lead to more engagement: "Yes, I have heard that. I don't know (or I do know) of a specific case but you are probably correct. Where there is smoke their is fire. I believe that most powerful men have the morals od an ally cat." I started a CHALLENGE thread yesterday trying to draw members closer together. We must have something in common that we can agree on. Nevertheless, not one on topic reply. THAT'S EXACTLY what the book is about.