Speaking the Truth is Incompatible With American Democracy

I think what you and the rest of the RW really fear is that Obama is getting really good at what he does. He is taking RW obstructionism apart and making you guys look like fools. That is what you cannot afford not his policies. I don't know what you mean by "tolerate" more changes but you're not a very tolerant group to begin with.

This one I am saving for the nest time you complain about RW obstructionism!

I like having a puppy like you following me around. It's so cute.

Ah Gee! I did not realize you cared so much

I haven't underestimated BO at all, he's good at what he does and what he does best is lie, deceive and manipulate.

Classy!

I thought you would appreciate a picture of yourself.

Thanks David. I was trying to quote a national socialist without pushing his anti-semtic rant which the last part did which to my surprise Moen posted. Hope it did not offend anyone or worse encourage for I did not want it to lead to that. Basically The new democrats seem to be against capitists just like the Hitler bunch and are also against free speech never mind a thinking mind. Saw it start with the political correctness measures which were also used back in the day with hitler's socialists as is shown below.

Joseph Paul Goebbels,

"It is the absolute right of the state to supervise the formation of public opinion."

Of course that makes absolutely zero sense since the part you posted referenced the Jews and the part you left out and I posted, "of the misuse of the nation’s goods" says nothing about the Jews.

There simply has to be something in the water you guys are drinking or maybe the Kool Aid. Nothing else explains the complete lack of ability to see what is right in front of your faces. Just surreal, absolutely surreal.

I guess I should have picked up on moen's anti-semitic views.

Think Moen just got caught up in the moment without thinking about what he was posting but I think a lot of still current obama supporters are anti-jewish and anti-christs.

In 2008, Obama had very considerable support from the Jewish community. Since that time, the support has dwindled:

http://www.newsmax.com/RonaldKessler/Obama-Jews-support-Wright/2010/04/28/id/357172

By "anti-Jewish" I presume you mean "anyone against the Jewish community". In that regard, it may be that if Obama's Jewish support is decreasing an anti-Jewish support is increasing. I can't find any statistics supporting that claim, however.

Now, "anti-Christian" or "non-Christians" is a different story. Obama's support from Christians certainly IS in decline:

http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/17-leadership/350-christian-support-for-obama-declines

I agree. It hasn't passed my notice that the Saudi's (and many others) have bought large amounts of American assets over the past few decades (that I've seen, possibly even earlier). That the news we get is filtered through their World-view should be disturbing to all.

Just thought I'd point-out a few things boss...

...so it isn't gonna happen.

He is not! ...He's just pointing-it-out...

Well, they are tolerant of some things; greed, selfishness, lies that make their political views appear cuddly and cute instead of vulgar and ugly.

...otherwise I'd agree 99% with you...

Glad I am not the only one who noticed be it fox or cnn msn type channels the overwhelming vast majority of our news has turned into political soap operas and celebrity worship

That's one thing I took to heart at a young age... the "don't believe everything you hear or see" thing. I learned how to ask myself whether or not something was truthful or not, whether I could trust the information I received. After a while it became relatively easy to see when they (the media) are manipulating people or are they simply reporting a story. It's rarely simply reporting.

As I said earlier, CNN is basically calling for people to support the removal of the Syrian government. On RT (Russian) of course, the opposite can be said. Both have an agenda, both push for a particular response from the public, both should be viewed with more than just your eyes open... an open mind helps to filter the bs.

As for Syria, Americans (and others) should be extremely wary of supporting a military engagement, but it may prove inevitable. The Syrian government is aggressively beating down any thought of rebellion there, and while some of it is against rebelious citizens bent on "overthrowing the regime", quite a few have been innocents who were simply at the wrong place at the wrong time.

It's one thing when a country fights to retain order in their society, it's another when they are merciless about it.

Why should we be "wary"? NOT taking action would be reprehensible! At least, that's what you said back in September when I asked if America should be the world's policeman:

http://www.partisanlines.com/threads/anyone-but-obama.3854/page-5#post-68502

You can be wary all you want. But, you said that you believed in the ideal of defending someone who doesn't deserve to be attacked...

First question: Do you believe the Syrian people deserve to be attacked?

Second question: If you believe the Syrian people don't deserve to be attacked, are we (the American government) reprehensible in not defending them?

I gotta say that just about every single 'What if' he said is pretty much exactly how I see our current system of government and the 2 party system (and the media's complicity in it).