Speaking of 'Fake News' ...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by L'Emmerdeur, Jun 15, 2017.

  1. L'Emmerdeur

    L'Emmerdeur Upright Member

    If I hadn't already known just how shamelessly dishonest the right wing media is, this story would have amazed me. Hannity is a complete tool.

    'Conservative "news" outlets didn't like Comey's testimony—so they created a fake version instead'

    [​IMG]

    'The New York Times has a good look at how one particular conspiracy theory, a completely false notion that ex-FBI director James Comey said Trump did not ask he halt the Flynn investigation in his mid-May Senate testimony despite Comey in fact asserting no such thing, ricocheted around the usual conservative sites in a transparent hoax. It started with troll Jack Posobiec, who simply made it up. Breitbart and Alex Jones jumped on it and soon it made it to Rush Limbaugh and, of course, Fox News' Sean Hannity.

    'It was an absolute fraud, and one that could easily have been proven a fraud by anyone who bothered to check—and it's difficult to believe that the entire staff of Breitbart and Sean Hannity's show were so uninformed as to the explosive nature of Comey's testimony that they could have plausibly believed it in the first place. Comey's testimony about Trump pressuring him to drop the investigation was the top news story of the day; peddling a tweet from a known hoaxer that claims the exact opposite can't be described as "falling for" a hoax. It counts as being an accessory to it. Sean Hannity and his ilk were spreading the false version on purpose.'


    'In an email, Mr. Posobiec described his work as “reality journalism — part investigative, part activist, part commentary.” A day before his tweet, the White House had allowed him into an Oval Office photo op with the president, and he tried to ask a question about Seth Rich, the murdered Democratic National Committee staff member.'
    'The reason for peddling the hoaxes is simple: Many or most of their followers will believe them. They won't check. So it doesn't matter whether the news they present is entirely fabricated. They will get the desired effect—angry conservatives obligingly believing the conservative president has been vindicated—and suffer no consequences no matter how quickly their claims are proven false in other venues. It helps when you have an administration eager to help the effort. It helps more to have already pre-segregated news markets such that conservative fans aren’t likely to ever find out you’ve lied to them.'


     
  2. JoeNation
    No Mood

    JoeNation The ReichWing Abuser

    Alright! Stop insulting tools. I just heard a little audible whimper come from my garage. :)
     
  3. Takiji

    Takiji Well-Known Member

    Anyone can have his own reality. I have several. But if he expects others to accept it he has to support it using verifiable assertions. At least this is the way it apparently used to be. Verification has been optional, even frowned upon, for a long time now.
     
    IQless1 likes this.
  4. JoeNation
    No Mood

    JoeNation The ReichWing Abuser

     
    IQless1 likes this.

Share This Page