D.O.G.E.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Mopar Dude, Nov 13, 2024.

  1. Mopar Dude

    Mopar Dude Well-Known Member

    I have long said if the Fed handled their affairs like I handle my office that we would have a budget surplus each year. I am ecstatic at the prospect of this forward thinking. It is long overdue and I wholeheartedly applaud our POTUS elect for this….. If they implement a five day a week 8-5 mandated office attendance I bet that alone would eliminate 50% of the fluff.
     
    John Kamps, Swim4Life and CoinOKC like this.
  2. CoinOKC
    Yeehaw

    CoinOKC T R U M P

  3. Mopar Dude

    Mopar Dude Well-Known Member

    I view this new cabinet as a gift to my kids and grandkids.
     
    John Kamps, Swim4Life and CoinOKC like this.
  4. justafarmer

    justafarmer Well-Known Member

    At this time I view it as a dog with no teeth. Lots of bark with no bite.
     
  5. toughcoins

    toughcoins Rarely is the liberal viewpoint tainted by realism

    Giv'em a chance . . . the leash can't come off for another couple of months.
     
    John Kamps likes this.
  6. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    Nothing says "efficiency" from the top like getting 2 co-leaders ;)
     
  7. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    Ok Pocahontas, two billionaires that aren’t getting paid is inefficient.
     
    Swim4Life, charley and AveChristusRex like this.
  8. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    Today I learned: pay aside, leadership roles are more efficient with multiple people in equal power. Why don't we simply work towards maximizing efficiency and hire 5 more co-leaders willing to do it for free?
     
  9. The Roman Republic was pretty efficient, run by two consuls. Of course, it was eventually toppled but considering this is just one department it's really not that deep. Also, considering they'll probably wipe out plenty of unnecessary departments and programs, I'm not too worried. Having two people in charge also plays an important role to make sure no one person has all of the power- they'll keep each other in check. I also just don't trust Elon, so that makes me more at ease personally.
     
  10. toughcoins

    toughcoins Rarely is the liberal viewpoint tainted by realism

    Oh, yeah. There’s a maxim best exemplified by our Congressional bodies . . . :rolleyes:
     
    charley and AveChristusRex like this.
  11. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    Because this Federal Republic rejects Marxist-Socialist Ideology, Clown.
     
    CoinOKC likes this.
  12. Profiler
    Inspired

    Profiler Well-Known Member

    No, just no. You didn’t learned a damn thing. I encourage you to look at just the H.R. employment charts for any department of government. That’s a good place to start. All these individuals are getting paid by taxpayers dollars, and many are still teleworking. Efficiency?
     
    Mopar Dude likes this.
  13. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

  14. Mopar Dude

    Mopar Dude Well-Known Member

    Billionaires become billionaires because they have a keen sense of thriftiness.
     
    Swim4Life likes this.
  15. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    There's no ethical way to be a billionaire, and certainly no merit to it. It happens to those born in the right place at the right time, granted they don't mind some human exploitation.

    Do you think because they're so wealthy they deserve to lead? As a hypothetical, are you pro-oligarchy in that sense?
     
  16. Mopar Dude

    Mopar Dude Well-Known Member

    Simple answer is no. Everyone that prays isn’t called to pastor a church either. I know successful people and they are inherently thrifty people. Wealthy folks are terrible tippers….. Growing up we preached thriftiness as a moral standard. Then came along credit cards and easy credit and our nation has become a horribly indebted nation as a result. It is a burden that destroys families. That needs to change….. I don’t know the background of these men, but watching Trumps cabinet selections, I am confident that he is very in tune with selecting people that will advance his vision.

    And I strongly disagree that wealth is a function of good fortune. Some would consider me moderately wealthy. I would disagree but I have years and years of hard work to justify where I am. And I can assure you I had absolutely nothing when I began. Heck, I have an eighth grade education because I had to work instead of educate myself. Sure, some are handed wealth, but those are the exception.
     
    Swim4Life likes this.
  17. toughcoins

    toughcoins Rarely is the liberal viewpoint tainted by realism

    The sweeping perspective ingrained in your liberal mind completely shuts out all but the Gordon Gekkos. Perhaps the life story of a Warren Buffet or similarly philanthropic billionaire would elicit a disbelieving yawn from you.


    As if it's not human exploitation to do no work and collect the monthly welfare check funded by the hard work of others, or take out college loans and then leave one's debt behind for others to pay . . . :rolleyes:.


    It's not as if Trump invited Kim Kardashian to offer the advice he seeks.
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2024 at 8:20 AM
    Swim4Life and CoinOKC like this.
  18. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    He literally did though.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kim-kardashian-visits-white-house-criminal-justice-reform-2020-03-04/

    Let's get something straight. I recognize wealth as a multifunctional outcome. 1 facet is definitely hard work. However, I don't think it's fair to conflate the general concept of "wealth" with that of a billionaire. There's no work that valuable.

    To put it in perspective, I'd feel pretty well off if I made $150,000/year. I might consider myself wealthy, a salary that requires a lot of qualification and hard work. At that wage, if I didn't spend a penny, I would only be around 3/4 of the way to being billionaire if I started my job right as the pyramids were being built. ~5000 years ago.

    Billions aren't earned, they're seized.
     
  19. Mopar Dude

    Mopar Dude Well-Known Member

    That’s fine if that is the standard bearer. Just accept that standard applies to the Soros’, Strykers, Broads and Ziffs of the world. Sword cuts two ways…. These who use their wealth to influence lawmakers wantonly.
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2024 at 9:36 AM
  20. GeneWright

    GeneWright Well-Known Member

    Yes, it's wrong on both sides. They all need to go
     

Share This Page